Journal Information

ISSN: 0890-1171
Frequency: Bimonthly
Register for a Profile
Not Yet Registered?

Benefits of Registration Include:
  • A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)

  • The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level

  • The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers
Previous Article Next Article
Article Citation:
Emily K. Burns, Elizabeth Ann Deaton, and Arnold H. Levinson (2011) Rates and Reasons: Disparities in Low Intentions to Use a State Smoking Cessation Quitline. American Journal of Health Promotion: May/June 2011, Vol. 25, No. sp5, pp. S59-S65.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.100611-QUAN-183

CIGARETTE SMOKING INTERVENTIONS AMONG DIVERSE POPULATIONS

Rates and Reasons: Disparities in Low Intentions to Use a State Smoking Cessation Quitline

Emily K. Burns, MD, MSPH, Elizabeth Ann Deaton, MA, and Arnold H. Levinson, PhD
Abstract

Purpose. Little is known about population-level rates and reasons for low intentions to call the quitline, a widely available evidence-based smoking cessation treatment.

Design. This study is a secondary analysis of the 2008 Colorado Adult Tobacco Attitudes and Behavior Survey.

Setting. This is a population-based telephone survey of adults in Colorado.

Subjects. Study respondents (N = 1662) included current adult smokers who had heard of the Colorado QuitLine (QL) and did not report that they never intend to quit.

Measures. Outcome measures included intent to call the QL, self-reported reasons for not intending to call the QL, and knowledge of QL services.

Analysis. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used for each outcome variable. All analyses were weighted for complex survey design to represent the population of Colorado.

Results. Overall 45.6% of smokers intend never to call the QL. In multivariate analysis, Latinos (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.4, 4.7), gay/lesbian/bisexuals (OR = 5.2; 95% CI, 2.4, 11.4), and those with no insurance compared with Medicaid (OR = 3.8; 95% CI, 1.1, 13.0) were most likely to intend never to call the QL. Perceiving no need for assistance (34.8%) was the most common reason for not calling.

Conclusions. A majority of smokers have no or weak intentions of ever calling the QL, with variation by subgroup. Reasons for not intending to call can inform targeted media campaigns to increase QL reach.

Keywords: Smoking Cessation, Quitline, Disparities, Intention, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research, Research purpose: program evaluation, Study design: nonexperimental, Outcome measure: cognitive, Setting: state/national, Health focus: smoking control, Strategy: skill building/behavior change, Target population age: adults, Target population circumstances: education, income level, race/ethnicity

Received: June 11, 2010; Revised: September 7, 2010; Accepted: October 7, 2010

Emily K. Burns, MD, MSPH, and Arnold H. Levinson, PhD, are with the Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado. Elizabeth Ann Deaton, MA, is with the Cancer Prevention & Control Division, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.

Send reprint requests to Elizabeth Ann Deaton, MA, Cancer Prevention & Control Division, University of Colorado Denver, 13001 E 17th Place/MS F542, Aurora, CO 80045; .